Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 23:31

Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
'Lilo & Stitch' and 'Hawaii Five-O' actor David Hekili Kenui Bell dies at 57 - Entertainment Weekly
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Men more likely than women to orgasm from anal penetration, study finds - PsyPost
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
New Chemical Kills 95% of Termites and Can’t Harm Humans - SciTechDaily
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
$80 Xbox games seem like a steal compared to what I'm paying, and I don't like it - Windows Central
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
How did it feel when experiencing gay sex for the first?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Scale of how chronic fatigue syndrome affects patients' blood shown for first time - Medical Xpress